MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1481632210

Structural Dissonance in Galaxy Decomposition: The red sequence and evolutionary pathways in the Coma Cluster

2014· dissertation· en· W1481632210 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jacob T. C. G. Head

Bibliographic record

VenueDurham e-Theses (Durham University) · 2014
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstronomy and Astrophysical Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAstrophysicsComa ClusterPhysicsBulgeGalaxyAstronomyGalaxy clusterHubble sequenceBrightest cluster galaxyGalaxy formation and evolution
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The structural and photometric properties of ‘red-and-dead’ early-type galaxies provide vital clues about the evolutionary pathway which lead to their formation. Here, I use deep Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope image data to explore the multi-component internal structures of red sequence galaxies in the Coma cluster, with a particular focus on disk-dominated early-type galaxies (i.e. S0s). Galaxies are investigated across a wide range of uminosities (−17 > M_g > −22) and cluster-centric radii (0 < r_cluster < 1.3 r_200). I present the 2D structural decomposition of u, g, i imaging via GALFIT. Rigorous filtering is applied to ensure that the measured best-fit models are the most meaningful descriptions of their galaxy’s underlying stellar structures. A sample of Coma cluster members (N = 200) was identified as well described by an ‘archetypal’ S0 structure (central bulge + outer disk). Internal bulge and/or disk colour gradients were implemented by allowing component sizes to vary between bands. Such gradients are required for 30% of archetypal S0 galaxies. Bulges are characterised by n ~2 profiles with half-light radii, R_e ~1 kpc, remaining consistent in size for all but the brightest galaxies (M_g < −20.5). S0 disks are brighter (at fixed size, or smaller at fixed luminosity) than those of star-forming spirals. Similar colour-magnitude relations are found for both bulges and disks. The global red sequence for S0s in Coma hence results from a combination of both component trends. The average bulge − disk colour difference is 0.09 ± 0.01 mag in g − i, and 0.16 ± 0.01 mag in u − g. Using simple stellar population models, bulges are either ~2-3× older, or ~2× more metal-rich than disks. The trend towards bluer global S0 colours observed further from Coma’s core is driven by a significant correlation of disk colour with cluster-centric radius. An equivalent trend is detected in bulge colours at a marginal significance level. An environment-mediated mechanism of disk fading is favoured as the dominant factor in S0 formation. The decomposition analysis was then extended to encompass a wider range of structural models. This revealed a large sample of reliably-fit, symmetric multi-component galaxies in Coma (N = 478). 42±3% of Coma cluster galaxies (N = 201) are best described by a 3(+) component structure. In addition, 11% of galaxies (N = 52) feature a break in their outer profiles, indicating truncated or anti-truncated disks. Beyond the break radius, truncated disks are consistent in structure with untruncated disks, disfavouring a formation mechanism via physical truncation of exponential disks. The sizes/luminosities of bulges in antitruncated galaxies correlate strongly with galaxy luminosity, indicating a bulge-enhancement formation mechanism for anti-truncated disks. Both types of broken disk are found overwhelmingly (> 70%) in barred galaxies, suggesting that galaxy bar play an important role in formation of such structures. The wide variety of galaxy structures detected in Coma highlights the naivete of the simple ‘bulge + disk’ or ‘single spheroid’ morphological paradigm for early-type galaxies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.047

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDurham e-Theses (Durham University)Same topicAstronomy and Astrophysical ResearchFrench-language works237,207