Climatic framework of the end of the pleistocene and the Holocene: paleoclimatic variations during the last 35,000 years
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Paleoclimatic changes are recorded by several methods. These fluctuations follow cycles of different rank and duration. Seen in a global scale, there can be little doubt that the climatic changes generally occurred simultaneously all over the globe. This does not mean that they are equally expressed; on the contrary, these changes are quite locally expressed. It is the coincidence in time that reveals the global climatic background. The Gothenburg Magnetic Excursion and Flip, characterized by Pacific VGP positions, provide a new tool for global correlations. The radiocarbon calibration scale is extended back at least to 10,000 BP via a new method based on shorelines and varves. Because of necessary good dating control, the present analysis is confined to the last 35,000 years. 1) Correlations of global climatic data indicate a worldwide synchronism without any detectable time-lag between different variables. 2) Climatic, glacial and eustatic fluctuations follow four main cycles: a 21,000-yr cycle, a 5250-yr cycle, an irregular 1000-3600-yr cycle, an irregular 230-1000-yr cycle. 3) Geoidal-eustasy is a new factor which is related to fundamental geophysical processes. 4) Integrated studies of multiple parameters in the same long Holocene sediment cores have revealed a detailed correlation between climatic changes, eustatic changes, paleomagnetic intensity and polarity changes, atmospheric 14C production changes, etc, suggesting a mutual origin. 5) The main cause of the 5250-yr cycle and the two irregular cycles seems to be changes of the core/ mantle coupling and interface according to two different systems. This explains the correlations established and the absence of any time-lag.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".