MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1481840396 · doi:10.7202/1008853ar

La théâtralité dans Les Nouvelles françaises de Louis d’Ussieux (1775-1783)

2012· article· fr· W1481840396 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Françoise Gevrey

Bibliographic record

VenueTangence · 2012
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Literary Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Louis d’Ussieux écrivit deux recueils de nouvelles à la fin du xviii e siècle. Dans le choix de ses titres et dans un avertissement, il se réfère au modèle de Segrais autant qu’à celui de Boccace, mais il souligne surtout l’influence qu’a exercée sur lui Baculard d’Arnaud. En prenant pour exemple quatre nouvelles extraites du recueil des Nouvelles françaises , dont deux au moins sont presque des plagiats, on montrera comment l’influence du théâtre a fait évoluer le genre de la nouvelle donnée pour une « anecdote » : la disposition des dialogues, le choix des scènes devenues plus importantes que les passages narratifs, l’intérêt pour l’éloquence et les excès pathétiques demandent au lecteur d’assister à un véritable spectacle, conforme à l’esthétique du drame. Ce projet est confirmé par l’illustration qui détermine la lecture en choisissant des épisodes spectaculaires de nature à intéresser les « âmes sensibles ».

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.933
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTangenceSame topicHistorical and Literary StudiesFrench-language works237,207