Universal Receiver for Weighted Circularly Convolved OFDM/OQAM
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The weighted circularly convolved OFDM/OQAM (WCC-OFDM/OQAM), a variant of OFDM/OQAM without time-domain tail overhead, is investigated in a doubly dispersive fading environment. A new receiver is proposed that resolves the self-interference present at a regular WCC-OFDM/OQAM receiver when the channel variations are too fast compared to the signal burst duration. This is achieved by exploiting the channel state information (CSI) available at the receiver to compensate for the channel discontinuity that appears in the receiver's circular operations. The proposed receiver is universal in two regards: first, it performs equally well for a wide range of speeds and modulation and coding schemes (MCSs), and second, it does not require any change to the WCC-OFDM/OQAM signal structure, and thus, is transparent to the transmitter.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".