Regards croisés sur l’évolution du déficit démocratique au Québec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
De la volonté de rompre avec la démocratie libérale bourgeoise jusqu’au souhait de la voir enrichie par d’autres formes, la conception des maux et remèdes de la démocratie québécoise s’est transformée entre 1981 et 2004 selon la conjoncture sociopolitique. Dans cet article, nous examinons 25 thèses signées par des militants, des journalistes et des universitaires en fonction de trois grandes sphères d’exercice de la démocratie : les mécanismes électifs et représentatifs, les mécanismes consultatifs et participatifs ainsi que la citoyenneté sociale. Le déficit démocratique constaté affecte tant la souveraineté populaire que la souveraineté nationale et appelle le renforcement à la fois du pouvoir des citoyens et de celui de leurs représentants.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".