MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1482158891

Erosion and devastation of river Subansiri and future downstream impacts of large dam : a case study from India

2013· article· en· W1482158891 on OpenAlexaff
Punyamoni Baruah

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFlood Risk Assessment and Management
Canadian institutionsMedicine Hat College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRiparian zoneDownstream (manufacturing)Hydrology (agriculture)Natural (archaeology)Flood mythErosionWater resource managementRiver morphologyGeographyGeologyEnvironmental scienceArchaeologyEngineeringGeomorphologyGeotechnical engineeringSediment
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hydro-power projects are generally categorized in two segments — small and large. The 2,000 MW project is being developed by NHPC in Garukamukh, at a cost of approximately $2 billion and height of the dam is 116 metre. But North-east India has a complicated geology and the lower Subansiri is situated in the seismic zone ‘V’. So large dam is not suitable for this region as they may fail during an earthquake. River Subansiri has been created tremendous devastation in the riparian villages by its natural flood. So small hydro–power projects are preferable than big projects. All the projects will have downstream impacts. So, NHPC or sensible state should reconsider their plans before it is too late.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.056
Threshold uncertainty score0.112

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFlood Risk Assessment and ManagementFrench-language works237,207