MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1482159564 · doi:10.4271/2004-01-3211

Application of a Synchronization System for Control of Ground to Airplane Power Transfers

2004· article· en· W1482159564 on OpenAlexaff
Hamid Timorabadi, F.P. Dawson

Bibliographic record

VenueSAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced DC-DC Converters
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAirplaneSynchronization (alternating current)Power (physics)Computer scienceControl (management)Power controlAerospace engineeringEngineeringTelecommunicationsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent advances in the development of a more robust synchronization strategy has made it viable to propose a control system for a no-break power transfer in aerospace applications. The proposed system constitutes a combination of a multirate phase locked loop with a positive sequence detector. Synchronization to the positive sequence component, in the presence of unbalanced loads, minimizes the circulating real and reactive power. The amplitude, frequency, and phase of the airplane power source are made available. The no-break control system automatically sets the ground power unit to the frequency and phase of the aircraft power unit and adjusts its amplitude to the required level. The relays are then closed and the ground power unit is connected to the airplane load. The amplitude information is provided by an automatic gain control (AGC) loop. The AGC loop ensures that the multirate phase locked loop is insensitive to disturbances, noise, and harmonic distortion present on power lines. The experimental results indicate a 60 dB immunity to impulse noise and harmonic contamination as well as a 20 dB dynamic range.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper seriesSame topicAdvanced DC-DC ConvertersFrench-language works237,207