MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1482162621 · doi:10.1071/rdv17n2ab163

163 DOES LH PLUS hCG, USED TO INDUCE OVULATION IN SUPERSTIMULATED COWS, IMPROVE PREGNANCY RATES AFTER TRANSFER OF EMBRYOS THAT ARE NOT EXCELLENT?

2004· article· en· W1482162621 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Marcelo Fábio Gouveia Nogueira, J. Buratini, C. M. Barros

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicReproductive Physiology in Livestock
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOvulationThecaEndocrinologyBiologyInternal medicineGene isoformFollicleAndrologyReproductive technologyOocyteEmbryoEmbryogenesisCell biologyHormoneGeneMedicineGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The LH receptor (LHr) present in ovarian follicle cells is essential for the biological response due to its binding to the ligand (LH). The events following the LH surge are related to the presence of LHr and its affinity to LH. Studies on LHr gene expression in theca and granulosa cells from bovine follicles have demonstrated the presence of at least four isoforms of LHr mRNA by alternative splicing. Two of the four detected isoforms have an open reading frame (ORF) and can be translated to functional proteins (receptors coupled with G protein) with different affinities to their ligands (Robert C et al. 2003 Reproduction 125, 437–446). From those two isoforms with ORF, one (full) has affinity to both LH and hCG molecules, whereas the second isoform (with deletion of exon 10) has affinity to hCG only. Recently we have detected the same four isoforms described by Robert et al. in both granulosa and theca cells from abattoir. Based on this information, the present study tested the hypothesis that, in cows superstimulated with FSH, administration of both LH and hCG, as an attempt to stimulate any variety of LH receptor present in the follicles, would result in improvement of oocyte quality and/or increase in ovulation rate. Nelore cows (Bos taurus indicus) were superstimulated according to the protocol termed P-36 (Barros CM et al. 2003 Theriogenology 59, 524 abst), and embryos were flushed 7 to 8 days after inducing ovulation. Ovulation was induced with LH (pLH, 12.5 mg, i.m.; Lutropin, Vetrepharm, London, Ontario, Canada; Group 1) or both LH (12.5 mg) and hCG (1500 IU, i.m.; Choragon, Ferring GmbH, Kiel, Germany; Group 2). Superstimulation protocol and embryo transfer were performed simultaneously on both groups. Mean (± SEM) of total structures, viable embryos, and viability rate were: 12.4 ± 2.36, 10.0 ± 2.38 and 80.8% (Group 1, n = 8 flushings) and 12.2 ± 2.03, 8.9 ± 1.66, and 73.1% (Group 2, n = 14); there was no significant difference between groups (P = 0.96; P = 0.71 (ANOVA), and P = 0.18 (Fisher's Exact Test), respectively). In a subset of embryos (excellent, good, fair, and poor qualities) transferred without freezing, the pregnancy rates for groups 1 and 2 were 41.7% (25/60) and 56.9% (37/65), respectively (P = 0.11, Fisher's Exact Test). The overall pregnancy rates from embryos of excellent, good, and fair qualities were 46.3% (25/54) and 58.9% (33/56), respectively for Groups 1 and 2 (P = 0.25). When only embryos of good, fair, and poor qualities were pooled, the pregnancy rates were 18.8% (06/32) and 60.0% (30/50), respectively for Groups 1 and 2 (P = 0.0003). It is concluded that simultaneous administration of LH and hCG to induce ovulation in superstimulated animals did not alter production of viable embryos or viability rate. However, the use of hCG in addition to LH administration could be beneficial for embryos of good, fair, and poor qualities. Nogueira has a fellowship from FAPESP (São Paulo).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.627
Threshold uncertainty score0.385

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproduction Fertility and DevelopmentSame topicReproductive Physiology in LivestockFrench-language works237,207