L’Éducation traditionnelle et la vie communautaire en Afrique : repères et leçons d’expériences pour l’éducation au vivre-ensemble aujourd’hui
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’objectif de cet article est d’identifier dans le mode de vie et d’éducation traditionnels en Afrique des pistes d’actions pour contribuer aux efforts d’organisation des systèmes scolaires afin de promouvoir l’éducation au vivre-ensemble aujourd’hui. La méthode employée est une approche comparative des contextes socio-éducatifs d’hier et de mutation d’aujourd’hui en se basant sur une analyse critique de la littérature y afférente. En conclusion, si l’on conçoit que l’éducation au vivre-ensemble peut être assumée par les systèmes éducatifs, ceux-ci doivent être conçus de manière holistique et être ouverts à une intervention des parents avec leurs outils davantage ancrés dans l’habitus communautaire. Autrement dit, un partage des responsabilités et une reconnaissance officielle du rôle des parents dans ce processus sont importants.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".