MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1482270327

Uses and Gratifications Achieved for Jordanian and Bahraini Youths Watching Dubbed Series and Movies a Field Study on the Students of Yarmouk and Bahrain Universities

2014· article· en· W1482270327 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Qudah Mohamad, Abdulkrim Ziani, Menawer Alrajehi

Bibliographic record

VenueCross-cultural communication · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicICT Impact and Policies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdvertisingTelevision seriesPsychologySeries (stratigraphy)Media studiesSociologyBusiness
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study aims to find out the uses and gratifications achieved for Jordanian and Bahraini youths watching dubbed series and movies. It also seeks to identify the motives of uses of young university students watching dubbed series and movies. The sample of the study consisted of 1,500 individuals. As far as the researchers know, this study is one of the first in both Jordan and Bahrain, which deals with the uses of university students of dubbed series. Results showed that the vast majority of respondents or 86.6% watch dubbed series and movies. Also 2-3 hours category of watching formed the top category by 49.7%.The individual watching came in the first place, represented by 40.6%. The small screen (TV) is considered the most watched media for dubbed series and movie by 67.1%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.498
Threshold uncertainty score0.405

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCross-cultural communicationSame topicICT Impact and PoliciesFrench-language works237,207