MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1482357509 · doi:10.1109/ssap.1998.739426

The third-order cumulant of speech signals with application to reliable pitch estimation

2002· article· en· W1482357509 on OpenAlexaff
Elias Nemer, Rafik Goubran, Seedahmed S. Mahmoud

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpeech and Audio Processing
Canadian institutionsCarleton UniversityNortel (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVoiceCumulantKurtosisHigher-order statisticsSkewnessSpeech recognitionComputer scienceGaussianNoise (video)Gaussian noiseSpeech processingHarmonicResidualMathematicsAlgorithmAcousticsArtificial intelligenceSignal processingStatisticsPhysicsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper provides a formal framework for using the third-order statistics (TOS) of speech signals and presents a new method for estimating the pitch and making voicing decision using the 3rd-order cumulant of the LPC residual. Analytical expressions for the horizontal slice of the 3rd-order cumulant as well as the kurtosis of voiced speech are derived using the McAulay sinusoidal model (McAulay et al., 1986). The derivations demonstrate that the skewness of voiced speech is sufficiently distinct from that of Gaussian noise and can be used to aid in detecting voicing. It is also shown that the 3rd-order cumulant slice has distinct characteristics in terms of periodicity, phase and harmonic content and is a reliable candidate for estimating the pitch. Actual speech data is used to verify the derivations and experimental results using Gaussian and street noise are used to demonstrate the performance in noisy conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.926
Threshold uncertainty score0.162

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSpeech and Audio ProcessingFrench-language works237,207