MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1482389542 · doi:10.47925/2011.295

Okay, Well How About Applied Liberal Education? Making a Case for the Humanities Through Medical Education

2011· article· en· W1482389542 on OpenAlexaffabout
Christopher Martin

Bibliographic record

VenuePhilosophy of education · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEmpathy and Medical Education
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLiberal educationScrutinyHumiliationHumanitiesHigher educationSociologyPolitical scienceAestheticsLawPhilosophyLiberal arts education

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

THE CRISIS OF THE HUMANITIES Once upon a time, a solid grounding in the humanities was considered to be an essential component of what it means to be educated. This perspective once benefited from a rare consensus between the philosophy of higher education and the public’s sense of the role and purpose of the university. This might sound like revisionist history, but I use the term “consensus” in a relative sense. No doubt the humanities have always faced some kind of scrutiny from those inside and out of the academy. In fact, liberal education has been subject to ongoing debates about the influence of the marketplace and its role in preparing future generations. 1 However, it seems clear that the humanities, and the liberal education that served it, was generally thought to deserve a special place in a person’s educational life. So long as the humanities were granted this special place, universities were largely free to offer a liberal education on the terms that they saw fit. This arrangement is clearly over. On the one hand, the situation of the humanities in higher education has had a particularly rough time over the past few decades. We’ve seen a number of admirable defenses of liberal education in response. 2 But the trend has crossed a threshold. An entrenched economic crisis seems to have been the final straw for a Western culture that has written the vision of education in primarily economic terms. For the humanities, this serves as a kind of double humiliation. First, education’s agenda was “broadly” defined as an engine to economic growth and social mobility. Liberal education is not well-suited to such aims. But as long as governments were able to provide funding, and universities were able to maintain a sustainable level of enrollment, the humanities could be supported as a kind of luxury or perhaps as a signifier of tradition and prestige. However, recent developments in higher education in the U.K., Canada, and the United States all seem to indicate that the humanities cannot be supported even as an indulgence. Government shortfalls in university funding have so far shown that the humanities, and the model of liberal education that relies on them, will be the first to go. For those working in the humanities, the short-sightedness of this approach is obvious. But this only seems obvious because they have already been initiated into those values and forms of thought that make the reasons for preserving humanistic liberal education, both academic and educational, self-evident. These reasons are not so evident for policy makers struggling to keep shrinking budgets in check, nor are they compelling for those charged with making difficult decisions as the austerity process continues. This poses certain justificatory challenges in trying to defend the existence of the humanities in the university.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.534
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhilosophy of educationSame topicEmpathy and Medical EducationFrench-language works237,207