Dependence on extracellular Ca<sup>2+</sup>/K<sup>+</sup> antagonism of inspiratory centre rhythms in slices and <i>en bloc</i> preparations of newborn rat brainstem
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The pre-Bötzinger Complex (preBötC) inspiratory centre remains active in isolated brainstem-spinal cords and brainstem slices. The extent to which findings in these models depend on their dimensions or superfusate [K(+)] and [Ca(2+)] (both of which determine neuronal excitability) is not clear. We report here that inspiratory-related rhythms in newborn rat slices and brainstem-spinal cords with defined boundaries were basically similar in physiological Ca(2+) (1.2 mm) and K(+) (3 mm). Hypoglossal nerve rhythm was 1 : 1-coupled to preBötC activity in slices and to cervical nerve bursts in en bloc preparations lacking the facial motonucleus (VII). Hypoglossal rhythm was depressed in brainstems containing (portions of) VII, while pre/postinspiratory lumbar nerve bursting was present only in preparations with > 79% VII. preBötC-related slice rhythms were inhibited in 1.5 mm Ca(2+) solution, whereas their longevity and burst rate were substantially augmented in 1 mm Ca(2+). Ca(2+) depression of slice rhythms was antagonized by raising superfusate K(+) to 8-10 mm. This strong extracellular Ca(2+)/K(+) antagonism of inspiratory (motor) rhythms was also revealed in brainstem-spinal cords without VII, while the inhibition was progressively attenuated with increasing amount of rostral tissue. We hypothesize that depression of hypoglossal rhythm and decreased Ca(2+) sensitivity of preBötC rhythm are probably not related to an increased content of rostral respiratory structures, but rather to larger brainstem dimensions resulting in interstitial gradients for neuromodulator(s) and K(+), respectively. We discuss whether block of pre/postinspiratory activity in preparations with < 79% VII is due to impairment of the pathway from preinspiratory interneurons to abdominal muscles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".