MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1482523054 · doi:10.22329/celt.v6i0.3734

15. Real Life and the Classroom

2013· article· en· W1482523054 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Shauna Van Praagh

Bibliographic record

VenueCollected Essays on Learning and Teaching · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLegal Education and Practice Innovations
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersMcGill University
KeywordsMerge (version control)PedagogyMathematics educationPerceptionPsychologyIdentity (music)Reflection (computer programming)Critical reflectionSociologyComputer scienceAesthetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The choices teachers make about both form and content in designing their courses shape students’ perceptions of the connection between ‘real life’ and the classroom. The choice to begin a first-year law course with stories told by residential school survivors provides an example of how to bring ‘real life’ into the classroom in a way which develops both critical understanding of ideas and capacity for identity-based roles and responsibilities. Classroom and ‘real life’ merge through issues and pedagogical approaches that combine deep reflection with active participation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.879
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCollected Essays on Learning and TeachingSame topicLegal Education and Practice InnovationsFrench-language works237,207