MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1482574662 · doi:10.4000/chrhc.4417

Otto Klineberg (1899-1992), la psychologie appliquée à l’antiracisme, à la paix et à la compréhension internationale

2015· article· fr· W1482574662 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Chloé Maurel

Bibliographic record

VenueCahiers d’histoire Revue d’histoire critique · 2015
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicAcademic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPsychologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’intellectuel canadien Otto Klineberg a toute sa vie œuvré pour la paix et la compréhension internationale au moyen de ses recherches, de ses publications, de ses cours et de ses conférences, dans lesquels, en lien avec des structures internationales comme l’Unesco, il s’est attaché à démonter les préjugés racistes et à apaiser les tensions entre groupes humains, peuples et nations. Il a mis sa discipline, la psychologie, au service de la paix et a ainsi réussi à faire le lien entre théorie et pratique, entre activité universitaire et militantisme pacifiste.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.994
Threshold uncertainty score0.185

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0060.018
Scholarly communication0.0060.005
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0040.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.363
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCahiers d’histoire Revue d’histoire critiqueSame topicAcademic and Historical Perspectives in PsychologyFrench-language works237,207