Analysis of Physical Activities and Perceived State of Physiological and Psychological Health of Senior Citizens in Los Baños, Laguna, Philippines
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study sought to determine the relationships between the level of physical activity with the perceived state of physiological and psychological health of 261 senior citizens in Los Banos, Laguna. The International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ), the Short form of the Rand Medical Outcome Study Health Survey, and Spearman’s rank correlation test were used to determine the respondents’ level of physical activity, perceived state of health, and relationships between the variables, respectively. Results showed that on the average, the respondents’ level of physical activity was moderate to low. Less than half (46%) of the respondents perceived themselves to have low physical activity while a little more than a tenth (13%) considered themselves to have high physical activity. More than one third (39%) of the respondents were uncertain if they were physically healthy while 37% considered themselves unhealthy physiologially. Half (50%) of the respondents considered themselves psychologically healthy “some of the time” while a quarter (25%) of the sample believed that they were only healthy “a little bit of the time”. Results of the Spearman rank correlation tests yielded direct but very weak associations between the respondents’ physical activity and their perceived state of physiological and psychological health. Keywords: activity participation, health perception, International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ), levels of physical activity, elderly, senior citizen
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".