MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1482687590

(Still) A "Real and Substantial" Mess: The Law of Jurisdiction in Canada

2013· article· en· W1482687590 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tanya J. Monestier

Bibliographic record

VenueRoger Williams University - Digital Commons (Roger Williams University) · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicConflict of Laws and Jurisdiction
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJurisdictionSupreme courtLawPlaintiffPersonal jurisdictionOriginal jurisdictionTortPolitical scienceTest (biology)Exclusive jurisdictionLiability
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Supreme Court's decision in Van Breda dealt with the appeals raised by both Van Breda and Charron Estate v. Village Resorts Ltd., 2010 ONCA 84 (Can.Ont.C.A.).C oincidentally, the appealing defendant in each lawsuit was the sarne operator of Cuban resorts, Club Resorts Limited.At the dine the Court relcased Van

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.080
Threshold uncertainty score0.580

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0240.015
Scholarly communication0.0120.003
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0080.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRoger Williams University - Digital Commons (Roger Williams University)Same topicConflict of Laws and JurisdictionFrench-language works237,207