Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article propose une analyse ethnologique des appropriations françaises du hip-hop. Il s’attelle dans une première partie à repérer les mécanismes du « branchement » initial entre une forme symbolique médiatique et un « contexte » spécifique, afin d’analyser les logiques de la re-production contemporaine du local. Ayant souligné l’importance des réseaux de l’État culturel dans la cristallisation de la version française de ce mouvement, il analyse dans une seconde partie les transformations ultérieures de la danse hip-hop dans son passage de la « rue » à la scène, stimulé par une politique dite « d’intégration par la culture ». La fabrique de l’universalité artistique dans les espaces culturels légitimes induisit de nouvelles normes esthétiques dont nous analysons les implications sociales. Dans un double mouvement de relocalisation puis d’universalisation, nous analysons comment ce mouvement a progressivement été intégré au patrimoine culturel français.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.020 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".