CloudSky: A Controllable Data Self-Destruction System for Untrusted Cloud Storage Networks
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In cloud services, users may frequently be required to reveal their personal private information which could be stored in the cloud to used by different parts for different purposes. However, in a cloud-wide storage network, the servers are easily under strong attacks and also commonly experience software/hardware faults. As such, the private information could be under great risk in such an untrusted environment. Given that the presented personal sensitive information is usually out of user's controlin most cloud-based services, ensuring data security and privacy protection with respect to untrusted storage network has become a formidable challenge in research. To address these challenges, in this paper we propose a self-destruction system, named CloudSky, which is able to enforce the security of user privacy over the untrusted cloud in a controllable way. CloudSky exploits a key control mechanism based on the attribute-based encryption (ABE) and takes advantage of active storage networks to allow the user to control the subjective life-cycle and the access control polices of the private data whose integrity is ensured by using HMAC to cope with untrusted environments. %and thereby adapting it to the cloud in terms of both performance and security requirements. The feasibility of the system in terms of its performance and scalability is demonstrated by experiments on a real large-scale storage network.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it