L’exploitation de la Nappe des Sables Quaternaires pour l’alimentation en eau potable de Dakar : une offre compromise par l’insuffisance de la recharge pluviométrique
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La Nappe des Sables Quaternaires est l’une des nappes exploitées par la Sénégalaise Des Eaux (SDE) pour assurer l’alimentation en eau potable de la ville de Dakar et sa banlieue. La pluie étant le seul paramètre de recharge, la hauteur des apports est calculée sous trois scénarii pluviométriques, puis comparée aux prélèvements de la SDE pour connaître la relation Offre/Demande. Les résultats indiquent que la recharge est insuffisante pour assurer une ré-alimentation efficace de la nappe lorsque les précipitations annuelles sont inférieures à la décennale humide. Dans le contexte pluviométrique actuel où le total annuel ne dépasse guère la moyenne régionale, les pompages de la SDE ne font qu’accentuer l’épuisement progressif de la ressource qui est d’origine climatique. Dès lors, une gestion rationnelle des ressources pluviales par des techniques "alternatives" est suggérée pour atténuer la dégradation quantitative et qualitative de la NSQ.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".