MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1483201757

A quad-band rat-race coupler based on the Generalized Negative Refractive-Index Transmission-Line concept

2013· article· en· W1483201757 on OpenAlexaff
A. C. Papanastasiou, George E. Georghiou, George V. Eleftheriades

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Microwave Conference · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Engineering and Waveguides
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRat-race couplerRefractive indexTransmission lineOpticsLine (geometry)Transmission (telecommunications)FabricationFrequency bandUnit (ring theory)Electric power transmissionPhysicsHybrid couplerOptoelectronicsComputer scienceEngineeringMathematicsElectrical engineeringPower dividers and directional couplersTelecommunicationsGeometryBandwidth (computing)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A quad-band rat-race coupler is presented based on the Generalized Negative Refractive Index Transmission Line (GNRI-TL) unit cell. The methodology for designing unit cells that account for the host transmission line is first described and then deployed for the design and fabrication of a quad-band unit cell operating at four widely used frequency bands. The measured results are compared to the simulated ones yielding reasonable agreement. Finally, a quad-band rat-race coupler is subsequently designed based on the unit cell measurements and the simulated results are presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Microwave ConferenceSame topicMicrowave Engineering and WaveguidesFrench-language works237,207