MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1483545773 · doi:10.1103/physrevd.87.103012

Cosmological parameters from pre-planck cosmic microwave background measurements

2013· article· en· W1483545773 on OpenAlexaff
Erminia Calabrese, Renée Hložek, E. S. Battistelli, J. Richard Bond, Jens Chluba, Devin Crichton, Sudeep Das, Mark J. Devlin, Joanna Dunkley, Rolando Dünner, M. Farhang, Megan Gralla, Amir Hajian, M. Halpern, Matthew Hasselfield, Adam D. Hincks, K. D. Irwin, Arthur Kosowsky, Thibaut Louis, Tobias A. Marriage, Kavilan Moodley, Laura Newburgh, Michael D. Niemack, Michael R. Nolta, Lyman A. Page, Neelima Sehgal, Blake D. Sherwin, Jonathan Sievers, Cristobál Sifón, David N. Spergel, Suzanne T. Staggs, Eric R. Switzer, Edward J. Wollack

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicCosmology and Gravitation Theories
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of Toronto
FundersScience and Technology Facilities CouncilNational Science Foundation
KeywordsCosmic microwave backgroundCMB cold spotPhysicsPlanckAstrophysicsSpectral indexCosmic background radiationCosmologySpectral densityAmplitudeInflation (cosmology)NeutrinoAstronomySpectral lineParticle physicsQuantum mechanicsAnisotropyStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent data from the WMAP, ACT and SPT experiments provide precise measurements of the cosmic microwave background temperature power spectrum over a wide range of angular scales. The combination of these observations is well fit by the standard, spatially flat $\ensuremath{\Lambda}\mathrm{CDM}$ cosmological model, constraining six free parameters to within a few percent. The scalar spectral index, ${n}_{s}=0.9690\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.0089$, is less than unity at the $3.5\ensuremath{\sigma}$ level, consistent with simple models of inflation. The damping tail of the power spectrum at high resolution, combined with the amplitude of gravitational lensing measured by ACT and SPT, constrains the effective number of relativistic species to be ${N}_{\mathrm{eff}}=3.28\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.40$, in agreement with the standard model's three species of light neutrinos.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.052

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.005
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations98
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmologySame topicCosmology and Gravitation TheoriesFrench-language works237,207