MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1483787086 · doi:10.1002/9781118001868.ch15

Differentiating the Dark Triad Within the Interpersonal Circumplex

2010· other· en· W1483787086 on OpenAlexaff
Daniel N. Jones, Delroy L. Paulhus

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPersonality Traits and Psychology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMachiavellianismDark triadNarcissismPsychopathyPsychologyInterpersonal communicationSocial psychologyPersonality psychologyQuadrant (abdomen)Interpersonal relationshipOrientation (vector space)Similarity (geometry)PersonalityMathematicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Dark Triad of personalities—Machiavellianism, narcissism, and psychopathy—all project onto Quadrant 2 of the interpersonal circumplex. That spatial similarity reflects their common interpersonal exploitativeness. An explanation of their distinctive behavioral tactics, however, requires both circumplex location and a specification of two moderators—temporal orientation and identity need. Temporal orientation (strategic vs. impulsive) distinguishes the strategic Machiavellians from the impulsive psychopaths and narcissists. Identity need distinguishes narcissists (high) from the psychopaths and Machiavellians (low). These two moderators may prove equally useful in the other quadrants by showing distinctions among variables that project onto the same location on the circumplex.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.152
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1530.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations356
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPersonality Traits and PsychologyFrench-language works237,207