MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1484027999 · doi:10.1109/icassp.2000.861917

Pitch-synchronous linear-prediction analysis by synthesis with reduced pulse densities

2002· article· en· W1484027999 on OpenAlexaff
Driss Guerchi, Yasheng Qian, P. Mermelstein

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Data Compression Techniques
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCodebookCode-excited linear predictionSpeech codingLinear predictionComputer scienceSpeech recognitionResidualLinear predictive codingAlgorithmQuantization (signal processing)CodecMathematicsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An important step toward achieving a high-quality 4 kb/s speech codec is reducing the coding-rate of the stochastic codebook component to near 2 kb/s. The increased reconstruction error in the residual that such low-rate quantization implies motivates the search for techniques that reduce the perceptibility of the errors in the reconstructed signal. Pitch-synchronous estimation of the linear-prediction filter and pitch-synchronous updating of the adaptive codebook reduce the coefficient-estimation error and increase the relative contribution of the adaptive codebook component to the synthesized signal, thereby reducing audible noise. However, pitch synchronous analysis normally results in a variable-rate coder. To obtain a fixed-rate representation, we introduce an efficient representation of the stochastic codebook component using a pulse density of one pulse per 2 ms and signed magnitudes specified by 2 bits per pulse-pair. The resulting reconstructions are evaluated for CELP coders corresponding to classical and generalized-pitch-predictor designs. In both cases speech quality comparable to 8 kb/s G.729 is achieved.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Data Compression TechniquesFrench-language works237,207