MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1484035999 · doi:10.21423/aabppro20104120

Effect of Feeding Bovamine® Probiotic on Passive Transfer of Immunoglobulin G in Newborn Calves

2010· article· en· W1484035999 on OpenAlexaff
K. Brakefield, S. Godden, John Fetrow, Paul Rapnicki, R. Bey, Deborah M. Haines

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Association of Bovine Practitioners Conference Proceedings · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldVeterinary
TopicAnimal health and immunology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersPfizer
KeywordsColostrumProbioticAntibodyLactobacillus acidophilusMicrobiologyPathogenic bacteriaFood scienceBiologyChemistryBacteriaImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Early studies have suggested that bacteria in colostrum may interfere with passive absorption of immunoglobulins (lg) in newborn calves (James et al, 1981), and recent studies reported that calves fed pasteurized colostrum had improved passive transfer of IgG versus calves fed fresh colostrum (Johnson et al, 2007; Heinrichs et al, 2009a). However, a recent study reported that colostrum bacteria counts were not associated with IgG absorption (Heinrichs et al, 2009b). Do pathogenic or non-pathogenic bacteria, living or dead, truly interfere with lg absorption? Bovamine® (Nutrition Physiology Company, LLC, Overland Park, KS) is a direct-fed microbial (DFM or probiotic) containing a patented combination of living Lactobacillus acidophilus ( 1 x 109 cfu/1 g dose) and Propionibacterium freudenreichii (2 x 109 cfu/1 g dose). The study objective was to describe the effect of supplementing colostrum with living or dead DFM on serum total protein (STP) and IgG levels, and apparent efficiency of absorption of IgG (AEA %).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.672
Threshold uncertainty score0.821

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Association of Bovine Practitioners Conference ProceedingsSame topicAnimal health and immunologyFrench-language works237,207