Contrer l'abandon en formation à distance: expérimentation d'un programme d'accueil aux nouveaux étudiants à la Télé-université
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article presents an overview of the sources used in setting up a program welcoming new students to l'Universite du Quebec's Tele-universite. The aim of this program was to heighten the degree of perseverance for those registering in the fall of 1991 for three certificate programs with the Travail, economie et gestion module. The nature and results of the program are set out and the findings are then interpreted. The conclusions underline the complexity of non-completion scenarios and emphasize the difficulty for institutions to address these problems. Dans cet article, nous proposons une recension des travaux dont nous nous sommes inspires pour mettre au point un programme d'accueil aux nouveaux etudiants a la Tele-universite de l'Universite du Quebec. Ce programme visait a ameliorer la perseverance des nouveaux inscrits aux trois certificats du module Travail, economie et gestion a l'automne 1991. Nous decrivons la nature et les resultats de cette intervention avant d'en livrer une interpretation. Nos conclusions mettent en evidence la complexite du phenomene de l'abandon et la difficulte pour les etablissements de formation a distance d'intervenir sur des facteurs significatifs pouvant le contrer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it