MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Future of Canadian-Mexican Relations: Agenda for the 21st Century

2010· article· en· W1484427593 on OpenAlex
Susana Chacón

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueLatin American Policy · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Policy and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProtectionismPolitical scienceRecessionHumanitiesEconomyInternational tradeEconomicsArtKeynesian economics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Currently, Canada and Mexico face a number of challenges. Even though the two societies may seem much closer than they were 15 years ago, reality shows that common and bilateral interests are not in place in either of their national agendas. On the contrary, it seems as though domestic and international issues caused a rift rather than improving closer relations. The most urgent challenge is the world economic recession that started in August 2008. It has led to a contraction of the market, lower consumption levels, and increasing unemployment rates in North America and the world, creating pressures for a change of policy direction and a domestic push for protectionist measures. This is particularly evident in the United States but also implies negative consequences for Canada and Mexico. Given the levels of trade interaction that Mexico and Canada have with the United States, it could mean huge economic damage for both. Therefore, it is necessary to balance these measures by trying to build bilaterally adequate policies to counterbalance the U.S. position. This situation offers the possibility of building a new bilateral scenario impossible to imagine before the beginning of the crisis. En la actualidad México y Canadá enfrentan una multiplicidad de retos. A pesar de que sus sociedades están más cerca que quince años atrás, la realidad demuestra que los intereses comunes bilaterales no tienen un lugar prioritario en ninguna de las agendas nacionales. Todo lo contrario, parecería ser como si los aspectos internos e internacionales impidiesen el logro de una relación más estrecha. Sin duda el reto más urgente es enfrentar la recesión económica mundial que comenzó en agosto de 2008. Esta conlleva la contracción del mercado, la reducción en los niveles de consumo y el incremento de las tasas de desempleo no sólo en América del Norte, sino a nivel global. De ahí que existan presiones hacia un cambio de políticas que favorezcan la instrumentación de medidas proteccionistas. Esto es muy claro en el caso de los Estados Unidos, así como lo son también sus consecuencias negativas para México y Canadá. Es necesario alcanzar un equilibrio en las medidas que se tomen y tratar de construir una política bilateral que contrarreste la posición estadounidense. Dados los niveles de interacción comercial que los canadienses y los mexicanos mantienen con los estadounidenses, una política proteccionista ocasionaría grandes daños a ambas economías. Esta situación ofrece una posibilidad de construir un escenario bilateral entre Canadá y México que no hubiese sido posible imaginar antes del comienzo de la crisis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.954
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it