MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1484533487 · doi:10.19059/mukaddime.95363

BATI DİASPORASINDA SÜRYANİLER VE SÜRYANİ KİLİSESİ

2013· article· tr· W1484533487 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Gabriel Rabo

Bibliographic record

VenueDergiPark (Istanbul University) · 2013
Typearticle
Languagetr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMiddle East Politics and Society
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiasporaHomelandWitnessState (computer science)Identity (music)Quarter (Canadian coin)HistoryEthnic CleansingForced migrationPolitical scienceEthnologyEthnic groupLawSociologyRefugeeAncient historyPoliticsArchaeologyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

20. yüzyılın son çeyreğinde Süryaniler'in çoğu, ana vatanları Güneydoğu Anadolu'dan ayrılıp batı ülkelerine göç etmek zorunda kaldılar. Batıdaki güven ve hürriyetin artmasıyla din, dil ve etnik kimliklerini korumaya, örf ve adetlerini geliştirmeye önem verdiler. Bunun için yaşadıkları şehir ve kasabalarda, öncelikle cemaatler kurdular. Daha sonra kilise ve manastırlar inşa etmeye veya satın almaya çalıştılar. Bunların yönetimi için Amerika Birleşik Devletleri, Orta Avrupa, Benelüks Ülkeleri ve İskandinavya Ülkeleri’nde abraşiyeler kurup metropolitler atadılar. Süryaniler'in nüfusunun artışıyla beraber kilise ve abraşiyelerin sayısı da günümüzde arttı. Süryani Kilisesi, bulunduğu bu ülkelerde hukuksal statüsüne kavuşmaya çalıştı. Süryaniler, hem kilise hem de devlet okullarında çocuklara ve gençlere din ve dil derslerini verme hakkına sahip oldular. Batı diasporasına göçün, yeni barınma ve örgütlenme gelişiminin görgü tanığı olan biri olarak bu durum takip edilerek ilk elden incelenmiş ve konu üzerinde araştırma yapılmıştır.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.004
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDergiPark (Istanbul University)Same topicMiddle East Politics and SocietyFrench-language works237,207