MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1484560003 · doi:10.33137/rr.v29i1.11404

<i>L'Amour obscur</i>, poèmes choisis et présentés par Robert Melançon

2009· article· fr· W1484560003 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Étienne Jodelle, Robert Mélançon, Anna Bettoni

Bibliographic record

VenueRenaissance and Reformation · 2009
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicFrench Literature and Poetry
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Renaissance et Réforme / 83 examples of poor proofing: Papaacy (p.15), and Brent for what I assume is the Brenta river in Venice (p.18).Thus, Englishmen Abroad represents a good idea unfulfilled.The history of travel is a very important and useful aspect of intellectual and cultural history; but Munter and Grose add nothing to it.John Dixon Hunt's Garden and Grove illustrates what can be done in the field of the history of cultural contact; Englishmen Abroad represents what should not be done.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.044
Threshold uncertainty score0.087

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.007
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRenaissance and ReformationSame topicFrench Literature and PoetryFrench-language works237,207