MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1484634590

Network-centric migration of embedded control software: a case study

2003· article· en· W1484634590 on OpenAlexaff
Phillip de Souza, Andrew McNair, Jens H. Jahnke

Bibliographic record

VenueConference of the Centre for Advanced Studies on Collaborative Research · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Software Engineering Methodologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceLeverage (statistics)MechatronicsSoftwareThe InternetControl (management)ElectronicsMicrocontrollerBusiness process reengineeringSoftware engineeringEmbedded systemEngineeringWorld Wide WebOperating systemManufacturing engineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Over the last two decades, microcontrollers have replaced conventional electronics in the control of most mechatronic devices in use today. Recently, we have seen the beginning of a new technological movement that aims towards using the Internet for integrating embedded devices to form pervasive computing infrastructures. Smart Spaces, tele-control and Business-To-Machine (B2M) eCommerce are among the emerging technologies currently under research and development.In a collaborative project with industry and the Herzberg Institute of Astrophysics, we have investigated tools and techniques that aid the migration of existing embedded control software to such network-centric environments. The goal is to be able to inexpensively leverage existing products to modern applications rather than having to re-implement highly specialized embedded programs.This paper reports on our experiences with a case study on migrating a real-world micro-controller application to a networked infrastructure. Based on our experiences, we propose a method that would help practitioners tackle similar reengineering projects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0040.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.157
GPT teacher head0.417
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueConference of the Centre for Advanced Studies on Collaborative ResearchSame topicAdvanced Software Engineering MethodologiesFrench-language works237,207