MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1484798310 · doi:10.1002/0471643505.ch1

Performance Evaluation in Telecommunications

2004· other· en· W1484798310 on OpenAlexaff
J.F. Hayes, Thimma V. J. Ganesh Babu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Optical Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFacsimileTelecommunicationsComputer scienceSketchComputer networkTelephone networkTelecommunications networkNetwork packetTelephonyField (mathematics)Circuit switchingOSI modelPacket switchingTelephone exchangePremiseTelephone lineInterconnection

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The chapter starts with the general introduction to telecommunication networks in the form of a summary covering the main components of the system: Customer premise equipment-facsimile, modems and LANs. Local network consisting of digital subscriber lines and cable modems, and wireless. Long haul networks Switching - circuit and packet switching The OSI reference model, which is the functional organization of the network recommended by ISO, is presented. Next, are the three general approaches to performance evaluation namely: the analysis, simulation, and prototypes. This is followed by a discussion, in the form of a historical sketch, of the evolution of the field as motivated by advances in the telephone network. In the last section, the computational tools used in demonstrating the numerical examples throughout the text are presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.025
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.042

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.025
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Optical Network TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207