MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Removal Processes of Antibiotics in Waters and Wastewaters: Crucial Link to Physical-Chemical Properties and Degradation

2015· article· en· W1484925221 on OpenAlexafffund
Rama Pulicharla, Satinder Kaur Brar, Patrick Drogui, M. Verma, Rao Y. Surampalli

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Hazardous Toxic and Radioactive Waste · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsWastewaterDegradation (telecommunications)ContaminationPollutionAntibioticsEnvironmental scienceSewage treatmentEnvironmental chemistryWaste managementChemistryEnvironmental engineeringComputer scienceEngineeringBiologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The presence of antibiotic residues in the environment is an emerging pollution issue due to their uninterrupted and unrestrained release into the environment and their harmful effects even at low concentrations. The occurrence and fate of these trace contaminants during wastewater treatment are key issues in the recycling of water resources. One of the major concerns is the presence of antibiotics in drinking water subsequent to wastewater treatment. Several processes have been adopted to degrade or eliminate antibiotics efficiently. This paper provides an insight on efficacy of various advanced oxidation processes for the removal of antibiotics and its crucial link to their physical-chemical properties and degradation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.334

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Hazardous Toxic and Radioactive WasteSame topicPharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental ImpactsFrench-language works237,207