MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1484932616 · doi:10.1109/isgt.2015.7131827

Denial of service attacks and mitigation for stability in cyber-enabled power grid

2015· article· en· W1484932616 on OpenAlexaff
Pirathayini Srikantha, Deepa Kundur

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Grid Security and Resilience
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceDenial-of-service attackDistributed computingNash equilibriumComputer networkSmart gridTopology (electrical circuits)MicrogridGridControl reconfigurationReliability (semiconductor)Computer securityCyber-attackLatency (audio)Power (physics)Control (management)The InternetEngineeringMathematical optimizationEmbedded system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Monitoring and actuation represent critical tasks for electric power utilities to maintain system stability and reliability. As such, the utility is highly dependent on a low latency communication infrastructure for receiving and transmitting measurement and control data to make accurate decisions. This dependency, however, can be exploited by an adversary to disrupt the integrity of the grid. We demonstrate that Denial of Service (DoS) attacks, even if perpetrated on a subset of cyber communication nodes, has the potential to succeed in disrupting the overall grid. One countermeasure to DoS attacks is enabling cyber elements to distributively reconfigure the system's routing topology so that malicious nodes are isolated. We propose a collaborative reputation-based topology configuration scheme and through game theoretic principles we prove that a low-latency Nash Equilibrium routing topology always exists for the system. Numerical results indicate that during an attack on a subset of cyber nodes, the proposed algorithm effectively enables the remaining nodes to converge quickly to an equilibrium topology and maintain dynamical stability in the specific instance of an islanded microgrid system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.319
Threshold uncertainty score0.193

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations73
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSmart Grid Security and ResilienceFrench-language works237,207