MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1485048185 · doi:10.30839/2072-7941.2013.24075

Міжнародний досвід становлення і розвитку інформаційного суспільства в умовах глобалізації

2013· article· uk· W1485048185 on OpenAlex
В. І. Пожуєв

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueГуманітарний вісник Запорізької державної інженерної академії · 2013
Typearticle
Languageuk
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomic Issues in Ukraine
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInformation societyPolitical scienceGlobalizationContext (archaeology)State (computer science)GeographyLawComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Analyzes the international experience of the formation and development of information society in the context of globalization, which is presented as an example of European, American, Canadian experience, numerous examples to reveal the direction of the Information Society, which are carried out on the basis of state regulatory programs of the Information Society revealed a large state role in addressing the issue of formation and the development of the information society.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.636
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.006
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0070.003
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.005
Open science0.0060.002
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0840.181

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.164 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it