Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’article articule une analyse comparative de trois terrains de la société islandaise : le projet de fichage génomique deCode Genetics à la fin du vingtième siècle, l’émergence du spiritualisme au début du siècle et les rituels médiumniques des groupes du Nouvel Âge contemporain. Or, ces trois lieux d’observation montrent comment un partenariat attentif entre morts et vivants s’impose comme une structure symbolique récurrente. Celle-ci est à chaque fois présente dans tout processus de construction cosmologique par lequel les Islandais se pensent dans le monde, se donnent un sens et, ce faisant, bâtissent une conception d’eux-mêmes et de l’autre. En dégageant la structuration symbolique de ce partenariat attentif, l’auteur tente une double lecture atypique : d’une part celle des significations insoupçonnées d’un événement scientifico-médiatique qui a suscité beaucoup d’incompréhension et, d’autre part, celle des formes de religiosité contemporaine qui se présentent en Islande sous les traits d’un échange coutumier.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.016 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".