MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1485264764 · doi:10.1109/robot.1995.525591

Limit cycle characterization, existence and quenching in the control of a high performance hydraulic actuator

2002· article· en· W1485264764 on OpenAlexaff
F. Mougenet, Vincent Hayward

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic and Pneumatic Systems
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Limit cycleActuatorLimit (mathematics)HysteresisDescribing functionNonlinear systemController (irrigation)LagMechanicsComputer sciencePhysicsMathematicsControl (management)Mathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The characteristics and the nonlinear dynamics of a high performance hydraulic actuator produced by ASI Inc. are described and modeled. When a feedback is applied for the regulation of output force, a limit cycle is observed. The existence of the limit cycle can a priori be attributed to one, or to a combination of, the four dominant nonlinear effect that were identified in these actuators. In order to pinpoint its origin, successive approximations are made to apply the describing function principle, so as to predict the onset of the limit cycle as function of the feedback gain. Given the experimental data, this method allows us to attribute beyond any doubt its origin to the electromagnetic hysteresis in the valve, which is based on jet-pipe technology. A multiple term lead-lag controller is designed and implemented to quench the limit cycle and improve the rise time of the force control by more than an order of magnitude.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.174
Teacher spread0.164 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHydraulic and Pneumatic SystemsFrench-language works237,207