MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1485364154 · doi:10.4171/rmi/773

Normalizers in groups and in their profinite completions

2014· article· en· W1485364154 on OpenAlexaff
Luis Ribes, Pavel Zalesskii

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Matemática Iberoamericana · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicGeometric and Algebraic Topology
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProfinite groupMathematicsGroup (periodic table)Chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Let R be a finitely generated virtually free group (a finite extension of a free group) and let H be a finitely generated subgroup of R . Denote by \hat R the profinite completion of R and let \bar H be the closure of H in \hat R . It is proved that the normalizer N_{\hat R}(\bar H) of \bar H in \hat R is the closure in \hat R of N_{R}(H) . The proof is based on the fact that R is the fundamental group of a graph of finite groups over a finite graph and on the study of the minimal H -invariant subtrees of the universal covering graph of that graph of groups. As a consequence we prove results of the following type: let R be a group that is an extension of a free group by finite solvable group, and let x,y\in R ; then x and y are conjugate in R if their images are conjugate in every finite quotient of R .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.599
Threshold uncertainty score0.650

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista Matemática IberoamericanaSame topicGeometric and Algebraic TopologyFrench-language works237,207