MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1485688443 · doi:10.1002/9780470514085.ch15

Involvement of Water in Host–Guest Interactions

2007· review· en· W1485688443 on OpenAlex
R. U. Lemieux, Louis T. J. Delbaere, Helmut Beierbeck, Ulrike Spohr

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueNovartis Foundation symposium · 2007
Typereview
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicCarbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of SaskatchewanUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryHydrogen bondMoleculeAqueous solutionEnthalpyLectinCrystallographyAmphiphileOligosaccharideStereochemistryHydrophobic effectHydrogenOrganic chemistryThermodynamicsBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As predicted by inhibition studies the X-ray crystal structure of the complex formed between the tetrasaccharide alpha-L-Fuc(1----2)-beta-D-Gal(1----3) [alpha-L-Fuc-(1----4)]-beta-D-GlcNAc- OMe (Leb-OMe) and the lectin IV of Griffonia simplicifolia (GS-IV) shows three hydroxyl groups (referred to as the polar key) hydrogen bonded within the combining site and flanked by hydrophobic surfaces. Apart from OH-6 of the beta-D-GlcNAc unit, the six other hydroxyl groups reside at or near the periphery of the combining site. Linear enthalpy-entropy compensation is observed for complex formation with monodeoxy and other derivatives of Leb-OMe involving one of these six hydroxyl groups. Decreases in both the thermodynamic parameters (- delta H 0 and - delta S 0) are largest when a hydroxyl group is in contact with water at the periphery of the combining site. The experimental evidence indicates that the binding reactions involve very similar if not identical changes in the conformations of both the lectin and the ligands; it is therefore proposed that the enthalpy-entropy compensations arise because water molecules hydrogen bonded to the amphiphilic surfaces of the unbound oligosaccharide and the protein are more mobile (higher entropy content) and less strongly hydrogen bonded than are water molecules in bulk solution. Monte Carlo simulations of the hydration of Leb-OMe appear to support this idea. In accordance with this proposal the association of complementary amphiphilic molecular surfaces from aqueous solution is driven by the release of the water molecules from both non-polar and polar regions of the amphiphiles to form stronger hydrogen bonds in bulk water. In the case of highly amphiphilic molecules such as the oligosaccharide Leb-OMe the negative contributions to entropy change dominate positive contributions that may arise from hydrophobic effects. The GS-IV(Leb-OMe)2 complex is stabilized by the hydrogen-bonding networks involving an asparate, an asparagine and a serine residue within the combining site and the above-mentioned key hydroxyl groups. Improved packing of the molecules may also be involved.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.855
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it