MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1485837172 · doi:10.22146/jsv.3507

Hypertropic Osteopathy (Marie Diseases) in The German Shepherd Dog

2014· article· en· W1485837172 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Dhirgo Adji

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Sain Veteriner · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldVeterinary
TopicVeterinary Orthopedics and Neurology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGerman Shepherd DogLamenessMedicineWhite blood cellLabrador RetrieverPathologyInternal medicineSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A Male German Shepherd dog, five years old, twenty six kg of body weight was submitted to Professor Soeparwi Animal Hospital, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Gadjah Mada University by Mr. Siswo Han, the owner who lives in Cangkringan, Yogyakarta on May 13, 2013. The dog was suffered from the pain and lameness on the front-left extremity for about 2 weeks. The dog having registered number of 8738/V/A/RSH/13 did not show any specific clinical signs, except the lameness. Skin and hairs, mucous membranes, lymphoid glands, and respiratory, digestive, circulatory and uropoetica organs as well were within the normal limits. The result of standard blood test for both red blood cell and white blood cell were still within normal values. Evaluation of fecal sample of the dog was also normal meaning that no parasites were found in the fecal sample. Radiographic analysis of the upper left extremity and the lungs area showed that there was an irregular bone growth on the left caput humeri, and the lungs were normal. Based on the lesion, the dog was diagnosed as having a hyperthropic osteopathy (Marie Disease).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal Sain VeterinerSame topicVeterinary Orthopedics and NeurologyFrench-language works237,207