MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1485965113 · doi:10.1109/pesw.2001.917000

Rating issues of unified power quality conditioners for load bus voltage control in distribution systems

2002· article· en· W1485965113 on OpenAlex
Su Chen, G. Joós

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue2001 IEEE Power Engineering Society Winter Meeting. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.01CH37194) · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Quality and Harmonics
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVoltageConditionersVoltage compensationVoltage regulationCompensation (psychology)Power qualityAC powerVoltage regulatorVoltage optimisationElectric power systemShunt (medical)Computer sciencePower factorHarmonicElectrical engineeringPower conditionerEngineeringElectronic engineeringPower (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Series-shunt unified power quality conditioners, including the dynamic voltage restorer, have demonstrated their capability of supporting bus voltages when faults occur on the AC system. This paper assesses the voltage, power and current compensation capabilities and requirements for these devices. For series voltage regulation, three methods are investigated. Sizes of the series and shunt devices, harmonic filtering requirement, and DC bus energy storage requirement are defined and discussed. The paper allows the design of a compensator that minimizes the kVA rating as a function of a given application.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.951
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it