Bibliographic record
Abstract
To say I enjoyed the Santorini Voice would be a lie. It also would be a ridiculous understatement. I was terrified on my way to Greece. I was also exhausted--having just finished teaching in Italy and Turkey--and certainly not feeling physically or mentally sharp. On top of this, I felt ill-prepared for what lay ahead. My ideal self had prepared for the ominously titled Symposium by studying all the philosophical texts that had been recommended, in addition to researching appropriate texts on the teaching of voice. Unfortunately, my true self landed in Santorini with nothing ready: shaky hands, empty head, and a barely memorized sonnet. Here's the thing, the truth: I have always felt, deep within, unintelligent. I think I pretend. What I mean is that, while I'm sure I come across as reasonably smart, beneath this layer I have a real fear about questioning another human being too deeply, fighting for a point of view, or speaking my mind, always assuming that the other person is smarter than I am, and that, if my pretence layer gets stripped away, the truth of my unintelligence will be outed. The horrible reality, however, is that I am a voice teacher. It is my professional responsibility to create the circumstances in a studio or classroom for actors to question, to fight for a point of view, and to exclaim it with passion! Somehow I had not given myself permission to do the same. And so, entering the land of PhDs, experts, and academics, I was bone-chillingly terrified. The jig was up. These people had written things! Books! Conference papers! My mind swam. What could I talk about? What could I possibly offer? Why was I here? [ILLUSTRATION OMITTED] What I discovered in the Santorini landscape of startling white and deepest blue, with that special group of human beings, was that I am a philosopher. And that I am smart. And that I am a researcher. I cannot express how meaningful this realization was to me. I was respected as a researcher and as an equal. Advice was sought. Ideas were exchanged. Questions were asked. This may seem silly, but I always believed that being intelligent meant reading something once and understanding it. When I heard the philosophers talk about researching the same texts for twenty years, I was stunned. And relieved. And stunned again: it suddenly occurred to me that that's what I do. I am a philosopher of the body! I have been on a research expedition for sixteen years. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.030 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".