MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1486524747 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2015.7129166

Optimization of control parameters using averaging of handover indicator and received power for minimizing ping-pong handover in LTE

2015· article· en· W1486524747 on OpenAlexaff
Noha Hassan, Khalid Elkhazeen, Kaarman Raahemiafar, Xavier Fernando

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHandoverComputer sciencePower (physics)Control theory (sociology)Degradation (telecommunications)TransceiverPower controlReal-time computingTerm (time)SIGNAL (programming language)Control (management)Computer networkWirelessTelecommunicationsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper introduces an enhanced automatic self-optimization technique that picks up the best handover (HO) limits of long-term evolution (LTE) transceivers. The goal is to minimize the possible degradation due to HO call drop, HO failure (HOF) and Ping-Pong HO to improve HO performance indicator (HPI)of the network. The proposed algorithm tunes the hysteresis and time-to-trigger based on exponential averaging of HPI and the average of the old values of the received signal reference power (RSRP). The results show a clear improvement over weighted HPI averaging without RSRP averaging.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.638
Threshold uncertainty score0.571

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced MIMO Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207