MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1486684451

Handling uncertainties of membership functions with Shadowed Fuzzy Sets

2012· article· en· W1486684451 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Automation Congress · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicFuzzy Logic and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFuzzy set operationsFuzzy classificationFuzzy numberFuzzy setDefuzzificationMembership functionType-2 fuzzy sets and systemsMathematicsFuzzy logicFuzzy mathematicsData miningMathematical optimizationArtificial intelligenceComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Type-2 fuzzy set, as an extension to ordinary fuzzy set, is defined as a fuzzy set with fuzzy membership function. Type-2 fuzzy set enables capturing the uncertainty of membership functions. However due to the three dimensional nature of type-2 fuzzy sets and the high computational complexity of their operations, in real applications, interval type-2 fuzzy sets are used. In interval type-2 fuzzy sets the distribution sitting on the top of the Footprint of Uncertainty that constitutes the third dimension of type-2 fuzzy set is ignored and hence the membership grades are intervals. This results in simpler operations and easier concept but causes loss of information. Shadowed fuzzy set discussed in this paper, provides a framework whose simplicity is comparable with interval type-2 fuzzy set but on the other hand preserves the fuzziness of the third dimension of type-2 fuzzy sets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.812
Threshold uncertainty score0.411

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it