Histoire tragique et tragédie : anatomie du pathétique dans les nouvelles de François de Rosset
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Plusieurs chercheurs se sont intéressés aux liens génériques unissant l’histoire tragique et la tragédie aux xvi e et xvii e siècles. Si ces études ont souligné la présence, dans les histoires tragiques, de certains procédés de théâtralisation créateurs de pathétisme, ce parallèle établi entre histoire tragique et tragédie ne s’est effectué qu’à partir d’une définition théorique ou empirique de cette dernière. Cet article met en regard les deux genres à partir de deux textes emblématiques : l’histoire IX du recueil des Histoires mémorables et tragiques de François de Rosset (1619) et la tragédie Hippolyte de Robert Garnier (1573). Cet examen révèle des similitudes dramaturgiques sur le plan du choix des sujets tragiques, de la fonction donnée à la voix « chorale », de la rhétorique des récits du narrateur-messager et de la portée expressive des discours de lamentation des protagonistes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".