Histoire tragique et tragédie : anatomie du pathétique dans les nouvelles de François de Rosset
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Plusieurs chercheurs se sont intéressés aux liens génériques unissant l’histoire tragique et la tragédie aux xvie et xviie siècles. Si ces études ont souligné la présence, dans les histoires tragiques, de certains procédés de théâtralisation créateurs de pathétisme, ce parallèle établi entre histoire tragique et tragédie ne s’est effectué qu’à partir d’une définition théorique ou empirique de cette dernière. Cet article met en regard les deux genres à partir de deux textes emblématiques : l’histoire IX du recueil des Histoires mémorables et tragiques de François de Rosset (1619) et la tragédie Hippolyte de Robert Garnier (1573). Cet examen révèle des similitudes dramaturgiques sur le plan du choix des sujets tragiques, de la fonction donnée à la voix « chorale », de la rhétorique des récits du narrateur-messager et de la portée expressive des discours de lamentation des protagonistes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".