MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1486973996 · doi:10.3917/rfse.013.0023

Retour sur le champ du pouvoir économique en France

2014· article· fr· W1486973996 on OpenAlexaff
François-Xavier Dudouet, Éric Grémont, Hervé Joly, Antoine Vion

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue Française de Socio-Économie · 2014
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Sciences and Governance
Canadian institutionsHistorical Studies in Education
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Trente-cinq ans après l’article de Bourdieu et Saint Martin sur « Le patronat », notre article se propose de revenir sur le champ du pouvoir économique en France à partir de 838 dirigeants des entreprises composant l’indice CAC 40 en 2009. Reprenant la méthode de l’analyse des correspondances multiples, notre étude met au jour une structure du champ qui oppose dirigeants issus de l’État et dirigeants étrangers, avec au centre les dirigeants français non passés par l’État. Plus que des types de capitalisme, notre analyse souligne la force des tropismes nationaux (titres et trajectoires liés à l’État français, passage par les grandes écoles), au moment où s’affirme l’effacement du capitalisme familial et une forte ouverture à l’international.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.218
Threshold uncertainty score0.434

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0050.003
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue Française de Socio-ÉconomieSame topicSocial Sciences and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207