A Study of the Kinetics of I<sub>2</sub>Deposition on Stainless Steel Sampling Lines
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, deposition of I2(g) on stainless steel tubing was investigated. The purpose was to quantify the rate of iodine deposition and desorption, as well as to elucidate the underlying mechanisms. The parameters included I2 gas phase concentration (10–7 to 10–11 M), relative humidity (<25 to 100%), tube surface temperature (23 to 90°C), and steel type (SS-304L and SS-316L). Gaseous I2 was found to deposit through both physical and chemical adsorption with deposition velocities ranging from 5 × 10–3 to 1.0 cm/s. At concentrations below 10–9 M, I2 rapidly deposited and was easily desorbed, consistent with physical adsorption. At concentrations above 10–9 M and low relative humidity (<25%), both adsorption and desorption were slow, consistent with a slow chemisorption process. At high relative humidity (>75%), rapid chemisorption with pitting corrosion occurred. Under some conditions, adsorption became inhibited resulting in an apparent maximum surface loading. At high iodine concentration, high relative humidity, and tube temperatures of 40 or 60°C, no such inhibition occurred, resulting in rapid and continuous iodine adsorption.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".