MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Correlates of PDE5i Use Among Subjects with Erectile Dysfunction in Two Population-Based Surveys

2011· article· en· W1487206829 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Sexual Medicine · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSexual function and dysfunction studies
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
KeywordsErectile dysfunctionSocioeconomic statusMedicineBody mass indexLogistic regressionReceiptDemographyGerontologyPopulationPsychiatryInternal medicineEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Erectile dysfunction (ED) is thought to affect some 150 million men worldwide, but many men with ED symptoms do not seek treatment. Existing surveys suggest that men with severe ED and who report support from their partners are more likely to receive treatment than were others. Less is known, however, concerning the influence of sociomedical factors such as income and body composition on receipt of treatment. AIM: The aim of this study was to determine the importance of socioeconomic status, comorbidities, and body composition on receipt of treatment for ED symptoms. METHODS: We used data on 638 men enrolled in the Boston Area Community Health (BACH) survey reporting ED symptoms and/or treatment for ED as evidenced by phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor (PDE5i) use. Logistic regression was employed to assess the relative strength of association between receipt of treatment and socioeconomic factors, body mass index, and medical factors. A replication of these results was then provided via a parallel model using the 2004 follow-up of the Men's Attitudes to Life Events and Sexuality (MALES). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: In BACH, ED was deemed present if a subject scored 16 points or fewer on the five-item International Index of Erectile Function or reported PDE5i use. In MALES, presence of ED was indicated by use of a validated single question querying ED severity. RESULTS: Controlling for age, body composition and other factors, increased household income, availability of a sexual partner, and provider diagnosis of high blood pressure were positively associated with treatment seeking via the use of PDE5i therapy in BACH. Results on data available in MALES produced similar results for household income and partner availability. CONCLUSION: These data provide evidence that financial disadvantage may present a barrier to treatment of ED, an increasingly important sentinel marker of the cardiovascular and overall health among aging men.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.863

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it