MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1487228232

Lost in Transition: The Regulation of Unpaid Labour during the School-to-Labour Market Transition in Ontario

2015· article· en· W1487228232 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Andrew Langille

Bibliographic record

VenueE-Journal of international and comparative labour studies · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicEmployment and Welfare Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStatutory lawStatuteTransition (genetics)Market regulationLabour lawLabour economicsCompensation (psychology)Section (typography)BusinessEconomicsLawPolitical scienceMarket economyPsychology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The main goal of this paper is provide a baseline analysis of the regulatory protections  that  youths  receive,  or  don’t  receive,  during  the  school-to-labour market transition. This paper is divided into two sections. The first section  overviews  the  current  regulatory  environment  in  Ontario pertaining  to  the  unpaid  labour  that  youths  undertake  as  part  of  the school-to-labour market transition. This section examines the exclusions, under  statutes  and  policy, which  deny  youths  critical  protections  under employment  standards,  occupational  health  and  safety,  workers’ compensation, and human rights laws. The second section analyzes the current  regulatory  environment  and  argues  that  Ontario’s  regulatory approach is largely little more than a series of statutory exclusions which deny  youths  key  protections  during  the  school-to-labour  market transition,  which  is  arguably  the  most  critical  phase  in  any  person’s working life.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.226
Threshold uncertainty score0.948

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.096
GPT teacher head0.385
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueE-Journal of international and comparative labour studiesSame topicEmployment and Welfare StudiesFrench-language works237,207