MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1487284488 · doi:10.1109/tmi.2015.2472836

Correction to “Regression Segmentation for $M^{3}$ Spinal Images” [Aug 08 1640-1648]

2015· erratum· en· W1487284488 on OpenAlexaff
Zhi-Jie Wang, Xiantong Zhen, KengYeow Tay, Said Osman, Walter Romano, Shuo Li

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · 2015
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMedical Imaging and Analysis
Canadian institutionsLondon Health Sciences CentreWestern UniversityCARE Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSegmentationRegressionNotationArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceRegression analysisImage segmentationNatural language processingPattern recognition (psychology)MathematicsStatisticsArithmeticMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Presents corrections to the article, “Regression segmentation for <formula formulatype="inline" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex Notation="TeX">$M^{3}$</tex> </formula> spinal images,” (Wang, Z., et al.) IEEE Trans. Med. Imag., vol. 34, no. 8, pp. 1640–1648, Aug. 2008.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.883
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Medical ImagingSame topicMedical Imaging and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207