Biodiversidade e suas aplicações: parcerias entre Brasil e Canadá, resultados e perspectivas futuras.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nos últimos anos tem crescido a consciência de que a vida do homem na terra depende de vários processos biológicos chave, mediados pela biodiversidade. Além dos bens de uso direto, como alimento, madeira, roupas, fármacos e bicombustíveis, a biodiversidade provê uma fonte inesgotável de inovações. Dada a complexidade e a dinâmica desses "serviços" da biodiversidade, a completa substituição por vias artificiais é praticamente impossível. Assim, deve-se procurar entender o papel funcional da biodiversidade e desenvolver mecanismos que visem o seu uso sustentado e conservação. Recentemente pesquisadores canadenses e brasileiros têm desenvolvido parcerias bem sucedidas que aliam a vocação natural do Brasil e o know how canadense pra o uso e manejo da biodiversidade nos sistemas tropicais. Nesse artigo destacaremos algunsestudos de caso realizados no Brasil, na Argentina e no Canadá sobre o uso e manejo da biodiversidade. Bem como, apresentaremos novas possibilidades de interação entre Brasil e Canadá nessa área do conhecimento.Abstract: The past years have witnessed an increasing awareness of the fact that human life on Earth depends on several key biological processes mediated by biodiversity. In addition to direct consuming goods, such as food, wood, clothing, pharmaceuticals and biofuel, biodiversity provides an endless source of innovations. Given the complexity and dynamics of those "services", the full substitution through artificial means is nearly impossible. Thus, one must try to understand the functional role of biodiversity, and develop mechanisms aiming at sustainable use and conservation. Canadian and Brazilian researchers have recently developed successful partnerships which bring together the Brazilian natural trend and the Canadian know-how in the use and management of biodiversity in the tropical systems. This article will bring up some case studies that have taken place in Brazil, Argentina and Canada on the use and management of biodiversity. We shall present as well new possibilities of interaction between Brazil and Canada in this area of knowledge.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".